I hold a degree and master's in philosophy from a Russell group University (The University of Leeds). One of the primary skills I have acquired is the ability to create constructive and cohesive arguments which flow properly. This requires a masterful command of the English language, which is something I have always been blessed with.
In order to argue in
A lot of my study of philosophy and the law has involved reading complex philosophical texts and/or case studies surrounding various laws. Deciphering crucial information, relevant to one's purposes is a crucial skill that is valued by employers. A lot of my lessons will involve reading different texts and then giving (where possible) group lessons where students have the opportunity to share ideas and interpretative accounts.
My argument is that sufficient explanations for our arguments are not enough, we must strive for a total explanation of our arguments, and this is the methodology I would like to implement. This involves exhausting every argument we have for our case. What this invite is as introspective and inquisitive exploration of our vocabulary which helps us strain our mental thoughts and push past boundaries, we privately set ourselves. It also involves a lot of self-doubt, as I invite students to not argue against one and other, but to firstly argue against themselves before they present arguments against others.
My writing practise is similar, as I encourage writing rough drafts down and revisiting ideas. Revisiting ideas allows for cultivation and amendment of our ideas, which gives us an opportunity to strengthen and refine out work.
All this all involves a lot of inward thinking which is crucial to outward mental expansion.