Kuldeep Yadav

Methods:
This qualitative content analysis study was conducted through purposeful sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten faculty members (3 of them from the best professors in the company and 7 from the best local teacher). Content analysis was performed by MAXQDA software. The codes, categories, and themes were explored through an inductive process that began with semantic units or direct quotations to general themes.

Results:
According to the results of this study, the best teaching approach is the mixed method (student-centered together with teacher-centered) plus educational planning and previous readiness. But whenever the teachers can teach using this method confront some barriers and requirements; some of these requirements are prerequisites in teachers' behavior and some of these are prerequisites in teachers' outlook. Also, there are some major barriers, some of which are associated with the teacher's operation and others are related to laws and regulations. Implications of these findings for teachers’ preparation in education are discussed.
Conclusion:
it was illustrated that a good teaching method helps the students to question their preconceptions, and motivates them to learn, by putting them in a situation in which they come to see themselves as the authors of answers, as the agents of responsibility for change. But training through this method has some barriers and requirements. To have effective teaching; the faculty members of the school should be awarded of these barriers and requirements as a way to improve teaching quality. The nationally and locally recognized teachers are good leaders in providing ideas, insight, and the best strategies to educators who are passionate about effective teaching in higher education. Finally, it is supposed that there is an important role for nationally and locally recognized professors in higher education to become more involved in the regulation of teaching rules.