I have a wide variety of experiences to draw from to present information to students in both a theoretical and practical way. I've been a combat medic, combat medicine instructor, x-ray technician, accountant, computer programmer, hotel manager, and card player.

My lesson format would typically begin with a definition of the subject or concept in question. Followed by a more detailed analysis of the idea. This would be followed by exploring the questions or problems solved by this belief and (if applicable) some practice exercises or demonstrations of the subject's application. This step might also explore the reasoning (fallacious or otherwise) that led to the idea's adoption or the rejection of competing ideas.

Finally, any problems or challenges to the idea would be presented, if there are competing theories and any sub-disciplines or work that expounds upon the topic, using it as a foundation for further work, would be explained.

This is a vague outline, to be sure. Certain topics lend themselves to different instruction techniques. Anatomy and mechanical engineering often lend themselves to more extensive use of visual aides. Computing and mathematics uses text more and offer more hands-on use of problems or exercises. Also, as some people learn more effectively with certain approaches, repeat clients may have lessons crafted to their individual needs.